Reamp box thomann software#
Reamp box thomann plus#
Reamp box thomann free#

Sometimes there will be some (optional?) resistive components to also lower the level, and perhaps some other features. So we can go from high-impedance and higher voltage to low-impedance and lower voltage at the same time. When using transformers to step down the voltage, we also step down the impedance.

It uses a step down transformer to get this impedance transformation that we require and stepping down the voltage a bit as well. To properly interface a guitar with a microphone pre-amp, we need to go from high-impedance to low-impedance and high voltage to lower voltage. Microphones will generally output around -30dBu, so the voltage is lower than the guitar. Microphone inputs expect low voltage and low impedance. Guitar amps expect a signal that conforms to these requirements. We can assume an average of about -20dBu for a guitar output. Guitars have a low voltage output and very high impedance (resistance to rate of change in AC current). So that will mean that impedance mismatches may end up causing changes in frequency response. If the impedance is mis-matched then there will be a difference in how much вЂњresistanceвЂќ exists between low frequency and high frequency signals. Since our musical signals have a complex set of sines ( see this post for more), there are complex interactions with the impedance of the circuit. The line from -1 to +1 has a lower slope. With a low frequency signal the rate of change is lower. The slope from -1 to the next +1 in the sine is a steep line. When we have a high frequency signal, the rate of change is high. In the graphic above you can see the difference. The rate of change of the current is what we generally call the frequency of change or just frequency. ItвЂ™s the resistance to change when thereвЂ™s an alternating current. The concept of resisting current flow show be pretty easy to imagine even if you have no concept of electricity at all.

Reamp box thomann software#

78.9mb ImpedanceД«efore we start thereвЂ™s a concept that needs to be clarified or some of the side-effects that we see happening later wonвЂ™t make any sense.Д®lectrical impedance, not the software development type (which is surprisingly similar!)Д®lectrical resistance is pretty easy to grok. These are the test results for the Frequency and part of the Distortion sections. HereвЂ™s the REW test files for use with REW. These are the results for the Distortion sections. HereвЂ™s the CSF files for use with Voxengo Span Plus. IвЂ™m using an old (and reliable) Radioshack SPL meter.

Reamp box thomann plus#

I will be primarily using MNoiseGenerator with pink noise then REW and Span Plus for signal measurements.

Fender Hotrod Deville 410 thatвЂ™s been heavily modified.

The following pieces of equipment will be used for demonstration:

Pad - A circuit that reduces the signal level.

Reamp - A box specifically made to convert an line level signal to something that can be sent to a guitar amp.

H-pad + pad means that I use the the H-Pad cable along with the Pad on the Radial JDI direct box.

H-pad - A resistor network built into the cable to reduce the signal level.

Reamp with a direct box? WhatвЂ™s the problem?.ThereвЂ™s also another 97.4mb of optional downloads. This post will load up to 105mb of data!!! LetвЂ™s find out with some measurements and then real world tests. What IS Reamping? What are these things you do it with? Why do you use them? And can you really do that?

Reamp box thomann free#

But your feedback would be really appreciated, so please feel free to correct me, and/or suggest otherwise.ThereвЂ™s all sorts of arguments on the internet on whether you can use a Passive DI in reverse as a Reamp, or go straight out of your amp or maybe use a special cable? SEND > Orchid Amp Interface > (pedal) > Thomann Millenium DI-E > RETURNДЄpologies in advance if this is the wrong way to go - I've been that long away from hardware. So, with all the posts within this thread analysed, am I mistaken to say that the following chain is the best and cheapest way to go? Also of note is that the lo-fi aspect that some non DSP pedals bring is also a consideration that appeals to me greatly. In doing so, I intend to feed two of my future mixer's auxes with a Boss RE20 and a Neunaber Immense for delay and reverb duties - both seem to deliver well for their price range, and the knobs on both pedals will be more accessible for changes on the fly than a rackmounted FX unit ever will IMO. The idea is to be as improvisational as my hardware live sets back in the 90's allowed me to, with composition (rather than live sets) being the theme. I'm in the process of going back to a simple hardware setup after working for around 15 years ITB and the resultant 'screen burnout' that followed. I happened to stumble on this thread whilst trying to further understand what needs to be done to use guitar pedals via a mixer's aux send/return.